Responsible AI in Healthcare: A Practical Checklist
A practical checklist for evaluating AI tools in healthcare: purpose, evidence, human oversight, privacy, bias, workflow fit, accountability and monitoring.
Convergence
Open questions Rohit is thinking through
These are questions rather than positions. Each is somewhere between an interest and a project, and collaborators are welcome.
Healthcare disclaimer. The healthcare information on RohitRohit.com is shared for general education and information only. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment, and it does not replace a personal consultation with a qualified practitioner who can assess your situation. Read the full disclaimer.
Quick answer
Quick answer
What is Rohit researching at the moment?
Three strands: how AI assistance could support individualised case review without narrowing it, how clinical records could capture what a consultation actually contains, and the literature and experiments around two contested subjects, water memory and energy healing, where the interest is in what the evidence supports and how claims should be worded.
Questions in technology and care
- Can retrieval help a practitioner review a case more thoroughly without steering the conclusion?
- What would a record look like if it were designed for the consultation rather than the invoice?
- How should decision support be evaluated in a small clinic, where there is no research team?
- What should clinical students be taught about working with AI, and when?
Contested subjects, studied carefully
Rohit is also reading and working through the literature and experiments around water memory and around energy healing. Both are debated and far from settled. The interest is in what the evidence actually supports, what the experiments can and cannot show, and how honest claims should be worded. Nothing in this work is offered as proven treatment, and no clinical claim is made on the basis of it.
Writing about a contested question is legitimate as long as the writing is clear that it is contested. That is the standard applied here.
Working together
Researchers, colleges and clinicians working on any of these questions are welcome to write. Shared reading, a small study or an honest critique are all useful outcomes. The contact page has a research option.
Insights
Related essays
Individualisation in Homoeopathy: Why One Diagnosis Is Not One Case
What individualisation means in homoeopathy, how case taking looks at the whole person, and the responsibilities and limits that come with it.
The Consultation Is the Data
Why clinic software often captures the easy fields and misses what matters in a consultation, and how to design healthcare systems that respect clinical work.
Questions
Questions about open research questions
Is this formal academic research?
Not currently. It is structured reading, note taking and discussion, alongside clinical internship and technology work. Any formal study would be described as such, with its method stated.
Why study contested subjects at all?
Because deciding what to believe requires reading the actual evidence rather than the summaries on either side.
Conversations
Have a question about this?
A short message with some context is the best way to start.
- Open research questions